Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 May 2005 20:52:39 +1000 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
Message-ID:  <20050505204235.L7880@delplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050505090907.GA41071@frontfree.net>
References:  <20050505084428.A12D07306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050505090907.GA41071@frontfree.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Xin LI wrote:

> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:44:28AM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
>> /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/modules/ndis/../../compat/ndis/subr_ndis.c: In function `NdisMFreeSharedMemory':
>> /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/modules/ndis/../../compat/ndis/subr_ndis.c:1710: warning: long long unsigned int format, uint64_t arg (arg 3)
>
> Maybe we should make use of the PRIx64 macro?  (see patch attached)

No.  PRI* is a bug in C99; it should never be used.  Just cast the arg to
a suitable larger type with a known format (uintmax_t here).  (C99 is
missing support for better ways; either %I as in sfio (?) or %DWIM where
the compiler rewrites the string to match the arg would be better.)

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050505204235.L7880>