From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May  3  0:33: 7 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4A137B5EF
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 May 2000 00:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au)
Received: (from avalon@localhost)
	by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA04251
	for hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 May 2000 17:32:56 +1000 (EST)
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Message-Id: <200005030732.RAA04251@cairo.anu.edu.au>
Subject: protosw or ipprotosw - code mess in netinet
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:32:56 +1000 (Australia/NSW)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Looking through /sys/netinet, it would appear that sometimes inetsw[]
is "struct protosw" and others "struct ipprotosw".  Which is it meant
to be ?  If ipprotosw is the same as protosw, why does ipprotosw exist ?

e.g.
in_proto.c:struct ipprotosw inetsw[] = {
in_proto.c:      (struct protosw *)inetsw,
in_proto.c:      (struct protosw *)&inetsw[sizeof(inetsw)/sizeof(inetsw[0])], 0,
ip_mroute.c:            extern struct protosw inetsw[];
ip_output.c:extern      struct protosw inetsw[];

Darren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message