From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 16 01:09:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7161F106566B; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E678FC08; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from L48.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 856503F446; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:09:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:09:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Michael Scheidell In-Reply-To: <4F8AB5C1.9030405@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <201204142151.q3ELpGFS087738@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120415132903.10f75d1f@FreeBSD.org> <4F8AB5C1.9030405@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pawel Pekala Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins Makefile distinfo ports/deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins/files patch-CDBashApplet.sh patch-Doncky-data-nvidia-config patch-GMenu-applet-menu patch-Network-Monitor-data-access-point patch-Network-Monitor-data-wifi patch-System-Monitor-data-nvidia-config patch-System-Monitor.conf.in patch-applet-appli-finder.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:09:55 -0000 On Sun, 15 Apr 2012, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> This will break when LOCALBASE != /usr/local and it's user-settable >> variable as documented in ports(7). And two small questions: >> - could some of this be better solved by using REINPLACE_CMD ? >> - there's a lot bash scripts, shouldn't be there RUN_DEPENDS+= bash ? > let me ping the previous committer gerald@ and see if he had any > discussions on this. his commit was about 7 days ago, and I have > searched the archives and don't see that any similar discussions took > place last week. Yes, I did suggest to the maintainer that he approaches upstream to find a better solution rather than hardcoding those paths in several places. That update of his was a clear improvement, however, so I did commit it without waiting for perfection. > I will also ping (without cvs-* and private groups) maintainer > fidaj@ukr.net (I am sure he would welcome patches and a pr.. he > seems to be very active with updates to this port) I found him very responsive and helpful and a pleasure to work with. So whatever further notes you guys have, let him know and I am sure he will try to honor them. Gerald