From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 18:08:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4480F16A4CE for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:08:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5732943FAF for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:08:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from delliver.face2interface.com (dialup-wash-129-203.thebiz.net [64.30.129.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id hAH283p6014617; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:08:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031116200600.034ace70@pop.face2interface.com> X-Sender: face@pop.face2interface.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:08:12 -0500 To: "Derrick Ryalls" , From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.0.20031115211837.0601e780@pop.face2interface.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: RE: Samba question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:08:22 -0000 At 02:23 PM 11/16/2003, Derrick Ryalls wrote: >CUPS is mentioned in the logs, and you don't seem to know what it is, so do >you have a line similar to: > >printing = cups No, good point. I have ;printing = bsd so that was commented out. >Also, did you define guest in smb.conf and did you create the acct with >smbpasswd -a No. Now I did & rebooted. Same symptom, i.e. windoz explorer tells me \\Swamisalami is not accessible. ... The account is not authorized to log in from this station. One thing I notice is that nmbd is running but smbd isn't (ps -ax|grep mbd). Is this normal behavior? more /var/log/dmesg.today|grep mbd yields nothing; looking at /var/log/log.nmbd the line Packet send failed to 192.168.0.255(137) ERRNO=No route to host sticks out like a sore thumb. I gather that lil' devil tried probing port 137 on lan ip 192.168.0.255. That node doesn't exist; my dns comes from a win xp box called delliver with ip 192.168.0.1 and dial up using win ics. Yet for some reason samba looked at a non-existent ip on the lan; also it reported no route to host. Finally when I do a find computer on win xp for swamisalami it find two. One's just that, the other is that parenthetically labelled Samba Server. Neither is accessible. Finally when I look for my fbsd box by ip adr on win find computer it now finds it - also not accessible. Looks like I did something right and something wrong. (stating the painfully obvious). Marty Landman Face 2 Interface Inc 845-679-9387 Sign On Required: Web membership software for your site Make a Website: http://face2interface.com/Home/Demo.shtml