From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 15:01:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655AA16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:01:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D7243D2F for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:01:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 23494 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2004 15:01:39 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2004 15:01:39 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1CD4869; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:01:37 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: ctodd@chrismiller.com References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 Dec 2004 10:01:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44acrxywq7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.10, amd64, and raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:01:40 -0000 ctodd@chrismiller.com writes: > Has anyone gotten 4.x installed on this type of system? (ASUS A8V, > Athlon64 3500+, Promise PDC20378 (AKA Fastrak 378, TX2000), and Marvell > 88E8001 Gbe) If so, how did you align all the planets with the sun to > accomplish this? 5.3/amd64 was a breeze, but I need 4.10 on this system as > well. amd64 (even under i386 "platform") just isn't as well supported on 4.x as on 5.x. There probably aren't many people with *any* experience doing what you're trying. > Also, which file/pkg contains "base"? I could have gotten the system > booted with that installed, all the man pages, docs, and most of the s* > packages made it. At least with a booted system I could upgrade it. I don't understand what you're saying, but I'll nonetheless take a guess that the answer is "base/base.??". That it might have been named a little differently on 4.x; possibly "bin" instead of "base".