Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:28:02 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs Message-ID: <4C84EC62.6020205@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100906131203.GA80251@icarus.home.lan> References: <201007141414.o6EEEUx9014690@lurza.secnetix.de> <AANLkTinYUz0V%2B2nSWBMYLf2fL8HnUQ-fvXT0q-5WY4bb@mail.gmail.com> <4C782D3B.6020407@icyb.net.ua> <201008271743.29393.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4C7835E6.6070309@icyb.net.ua> <4C7A2782.5040009@freebsd.org> <4C84DBE6.5010809@freebsd.org> <20100906122325.GA78727@icarus.home.lan> <4C84E4E1.8010709@freebsd.org> <20100906131203.GA80251@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both > RELENG_8: > > - Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10) > - Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel C2D E6600 (stepping 6) > > I'll make sure to provide what the topology looks like before and after. > Is CPU-relevant dmesg output sufficient? If you mean something like the below, then yes. Thanks! CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7300 @ 2.66GHz (2653.35-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Family = 6 Model = 17 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> Features2=0x8e39d<SSE3,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1> AMD Features=0x20100800<SYSCALL,NX,LM> AMD Features2=0x1<LAHF> TSC: P-state invariant [snip] FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C84EC62.6020205>