From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 22 08:07:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B88216A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:07:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mirrorball.theloosingend.net (m069c.studby.ntnu.no [129.241.130.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D1EA43D3F for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:07:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: (qmail 35679 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Jul 2004 08:07:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jul 2004 08:07:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:07:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@mirrorball.theloosingend.net To: Kent Stewart In-Reply-To: <200407212100.36551.kstewart@owt.com> Message-ID: <20040722100118.M33265@mirrorball.theloosingend.net> References: <20040721205511.Y237@mirrorball.theloosingend.net> <20040722005048.D95061@mirrorball.theloosingend.net> <200407212100.36551.kstewart@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: 3BSD cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Dan Rue Subject: Re: ports-collection borked? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:07:18 -0000 [Kent Stewart, 2004-07-21] > Sometimes mirrors break. The only way to find out is to try a different > one. The port fastest_cvsup is a good starting point. Just remember > that the closest may not produce the overall fastest cvsup. Not that I've tested this in any scientific manner, but I think the closest one is also the fastest in my case, as it is on the same /16-network that I'm on. In fact it's only about a km away, and it's 2Gbps all the way from my dorm room to the mirror, so I think my 10/100 nic is the limiting factor here. It could be out of sync or something, though. Whatever it was, it seems to be in order now (it may still be somewhat behind the master cvs-server, but the fixed index has at least found its way to the mirror now. And from there to my box.) sve