Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:17:31 -0700
From:      Steve Franks <bahamasfranks@gmail.com>
To:        Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   solved: Re: rpm trashed my system with linux so's
Message-ID:  <539c60b91002120817x42e9f81jddede6c85f67e26e@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Steve Franks wrote:
>> Main thing is that portupgrade -f gamin is *not* putting fresh bsd
>> copies overtop the bad linux ones I stupidly installed, and anything
>> with gtk is now useless (shared object 'libselinux.so.1" not found,
>> required by "libgio-2.0.so.0"), which is pretty much everything.
>>
>> Short of reinstalling everything from CD, do I have options?
>
> Sure. =A0First, however, please note that it is (presumably past) time to=
 obtain a working backup mechanism for any system that you care about.
>
> Consider the output of "find /usr/local/lib -mtime -2" (or some other # o=
f days). =A0You can use pkg_which to identify the port which should have pr=
ovided a native FreeBSD library; use pkg_delete -f _portname_ or similar me=
asures to more forcefully remove these Linux .so's.
>
> Regards,
> --
> -Chuck
>
>

Ok, got lucky: linux sticks everything in /lib, which is in the
default path before /usr/local/lib, hence the madness, and hence why
portupgrade won't fix it (it rebuilds most bsd .so's in
/usr/local/lib).

Just rm every .so file that gets complained about missing dependancies
from /lib, and you're back in the land of the living!

That was "fun"....

Anyone know where the "right" place for rpm to put real unix libs for
use with compat?  compat/lib?

Anyway, thanks, all

Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?539c60b91002120817x42e9f81jddede6c85f67e26e>