From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 8 17:39:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055F337B41B; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:39:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jmz@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g291dC041947; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:39:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmz) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:39:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203090139.g291dC041947@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Jean-Marc Zucconi To: Kris Kennaway Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: XFree86 package builds and interactivity In-Reply-To: <20020308162440.A49791@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20020308153335.A47885@xor.obsecurity.org> <200203082351.g28NpHh18013@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020308162440.A49791@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Emacs 21.1.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >>>>> Kris Kennaway writes: > Yes, that's what I thought too..what is confusing me is how this ever > worked. For example, a 4.x package of XFree86-4.1.0_12,1.tgz built > successfully the other day. Probably because 'make