Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 18:09:08 +0100 (CET) From: Niklas Saers <niklasmls@doriath.saers.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jail and emulators/linux_base Message-ID: <20031203164256.X19956@doriath.saers.com> In-Reply-To: <20031203141655.GB61570@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20031203101335.D11863@doriath.saers.com> <20031203141655.GB61570@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > "jail where I trust users not to try to take over my system" = "chroot". Thank you and Pawel Jakub Dawidek for pointing that out that possibility. Been living with jail-only thoughts for a little too long. ;) This solves my problem, although I don't totally agree as jail in addtion has an ip which makes it great for deploying test-setups. Using chroot only creates a need for workarounds. But hey, chrooting made me able to install the port and go from there. :) > That's weird..it shouldn't be doing that. What scheduler are you > running, what does top show, have you tried to trace the processes > using ktrace, etc? I'm using the 4BSD scheduler. top is showing 95+% free, and systat agrees that idle is doing a great job. :) I've put a kdump at http://niklas.saers.com/kdump.log of compiling bash. I'm afraid I don't know how to go through it to determine what's slowing down the build compared to a ktrace from the host environment (http://niklas.saers.com/kdump2.log). Any suggestions? Cheers Nik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031203164256.X19956>