From owner-freebsd-fs Thu Nov 28 4:36:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D45837B401 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 04:36:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3311543E88 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 04:36:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 0F4A0AE216; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 04:36:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 04:36:53 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "David E. Cross" Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openafs question Message-ID: <20021128123653.GN16066@elvis.mu.org> References: <200211281128.gASBS2g04424@monica.cs.rpi.edu> <20021128123550.GM16066@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021128123550.GM16066@elvis.mu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Alfred Perlstein [021128 04:35] wrote: > > Have getnewvnode add a flag to the vnode noting that it's meant for the > global list, otherwise store a "free()" callback in the vnode to be called? But seriously, this is a bad practice, it should be using the system allocator and DTRT. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message