Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:19:26 -0500 From: Alan Gerber <agerber@ncsu.edu> To: Grzegorz Danecki <g.danecki@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "screen" alternative Message-ID: <43D93CDE.6080803@ncsu.edu> In-Reply-To: <41b95770601261225m2a575b19o@mail.gmail.com> References: <41b95770601261225m2a575b19o@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg, According to Freshports, the screen package is the problem. You should be able to compile from source within ports with no problems (that's what I am currently doing). /# cd /usr/ports/sysutils/screen /usr/ports/sysutils/screen# make install clean Freshports link: http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/screen/ -- Alan Gerber Grzegorz Danecki wrote: > Hi List! > > I'm running 5.4 Stable and I'm looking for something, that can let me detach > my session leaving my software running. First thought - "screen", but hey, > there is no screen package in ports collection :( Google says something that > it was removed due to high cpu utilization few releases ago. Is this true? > Are there any alternatives? Because as I can remember screen was frequently > used and highly appreciated application. > > Or should I rather look for some sources instead of package? Any problems > with that? > > Many thanks in advance, You are doing great work here! > > Greg Danecki > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43D93CDE.6080803>