Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:50:00 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 216779] [NEW PORT] sysutils/acmetool: CLI tool for automatically acquiring certificates from ACME servers
Message-ID:  <bug-216779-13-F19DWq4KsA@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-216779-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-216779-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216779

Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |portmaster@bsdforge.com

--- Comment #1 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> ---
Created attachment 180702
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D180702&action=
=3Dedit
shell archive of sysutils/acmetools

Hello, samm!
I'm looking forward to this hitting the ports tree.
Last I checked the porters handbook:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/
the preferred method for submitting a new port, was as a
shell archive shar(1). In an effort to expedite your ports
acceptance, I'm submitting a shar(1) version of your port.
I've also taken the liberty of re-flowing the test in a
couple of the files, in an effort to prevent line wrapping.
I also added the sub-category www.
All of this was in an effort to help get your port into the
tree faster. If you like it; simply mark your .tgz file as
obsolete.

All the best.

Thanks samm!

--Chris

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216779-13-F19DWq4KsA>