From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 29 17:58:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2D116A400 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from trans-warp.net (hyperion.trans-warp.net [216.37.208.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE57D13C44B for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:58:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unverified [65.193.73.208]) by trans-warp.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 114816920-1860479 for multiple; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:59:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <835A09E2-14A2-4FB4-8B68-0B74730CFBA9@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:58:42 -0400 To: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Authenticated-User: bsilver@chrononomicon.com Cc: Sam Lawrance , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:58:52 -0000 On Apr 29, 2007, at 4:45 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sam Lawrance [mailto:boris@brooknet.com.au] >> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:59 AM >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: Greylisting -- Was: Anti Spam >> >> >> >> Email is not an instant messaging system, no matter how much you want >> it to be one. >> > > Cell phone companies won't take pages any other way no matter how > much you > want them to. And as I already have to carry a cell phone, I am > not going > to carry a separate pager also. Email only, eh? I used to send messages to my boss via webform...I suppose that would imply that it's possible to have a message sent by some scripts to a website, unless there's captchas or something like that to defeat that method. But like I said...most people would already have whitelisted vitally important domains, or you could send periodic "keepalives" to test the system. -Bart