From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 19 20:57:48 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183171065685;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:57:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E7A8FC16;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:57:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <48AB33C9.9010203@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:57:45 +0100
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
References: <20080818205914.GJ16977@elvis.mu.org>
	<20080819200017.GC16977@elvis.mu.org>
	<48AB3023.2030307@FreeBSD.org>
	<200808192253.26152.hselasky@c2i.net>
In-Reply-To: <200808192253.26152.hselasky@c2i.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: usb4bsd patch review [was Re: ...]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB <freebsd-usb.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
	<mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
	<mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:57:48 -0000

Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Keep in mind that any delay at this point to address review concerns
>> could have been handled 3 months ago when the commit candidate diff was
>> first requested, and are usually handled as part of the standard
>> development practises we use in FreeBSD (posting diffs for public
>> comment with a pre-announced timetable, dealing with technical review,
>> etc).  If following those steps after not previously having done so
>> means you now have to push back the timetable, that is unfortunate, but
>> necessary.
> 
> To not draw away any attention from the old USB stack I have not made any 
> public postings to any FreeBSD lists about the new USB stack as an agreement 
> with some of the core FreeBSD developers during the last couple of months.

OK, but this was surely not intended to block alfred from preparing to 
finalize and commit your work.

Kris