From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 26 14:49:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D54D37B404 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556FE43F75 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:49:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h2QMnKZA007118; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:49:20 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.8/8.12.3/Submit) id h2QMnK4o007116; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:49:20 -0800 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:49:20 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: "Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" Message-ID: <20030326144920.A6311@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from john.cagle@hp.com on Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:43:40PM -0600 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-37.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how many cpus can freebsd support in smp? X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:49:23 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:43:40PM -0600, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote: > It was about a month ago. When was the APIC mask widened? 9 days ago, but looking at the change, I'm not sure if it would help you or not. It was actually a change from 4 bits to 8 bits in the APIC_ID_MASK. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+gi5vXY6L6fI4GtQRAh95AKDnfDdrkutBwb5UygFTHXLcAY/5zACeNb4m bu3hgTWALwaqgCDzeIcZuaE= =0wXf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--