Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:02:11 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/23978: NEW PORT: security/amavis-perl Message-ID: <20010101170211.H72273@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200101010100.f01103k26744@freefall.freebsd.org>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 05:00:03PM -0800 References: <200101010100.f01103k26744@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 05:00:03PM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
> No. Use my suggestion. It is more modular.
Uhm, no. Either
(a) we can build the port with all the options without a problem
or
(b) we can only use postfix OR sendmail OR qmail etc
if the answer is (a) then just do that by default, why limit the
usefulness. if the answer is (b) then use my suggestion.
--
Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc.
- fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010101170211.H72273>