Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:58:49 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: m_getcl and end-to-end performance Message-ID: <20020820135849.B50369@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <15714.43504.493596.791872@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>; from gallatin@cs.duke.edu on Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:43:28PM -0400 References: <15714.27671.533860.408996@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820093939.B48541@iguana.icir.org> <15714.39494.661931.882244@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820132957.B49141@iguana.icir.org> <15714.43504.493596.791872@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:43:28PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: ... > > hmmm... that seems to be in the noise (i assume you are dealing > > with a fast machine), but probably because there is a lot of ... > This an SMP kernel using interrupts, not POLLING. And using the ... > Anyway, things max out at ~65K pkts/sec, so a few thousand > pkts/second is a little better than in the noise. ok, i thought you had a lot higher packet rates. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020820135849.B50369>