From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 18 02:47:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3099C16A412 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slash@peereboom.us) Received: from dev.peereboom.us (adsl-67-64-89-177.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [67.64.89.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70D513C441 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slash@peereboom.us) Received: from dev.peereboom.us (marco@localhost.peereboom.us [127.0.0.1]) by dev.peereboom.us (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l0I2ZZll019550; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:35:35 -0600 (CST) Received: (from marco@localhost) by dev.peereboom.us (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) id l0I2ZYui000730; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:35:34 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: dev.peereboom.us: marco set sender to slash@peereboom.us using -f Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:35:34 -0600 From: Marco Peereboom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070118023534.GL19473@peereboom.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Subject: mpt status report X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:47:02 -0000 I just ran across this URL: http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-oct-2006-dec-2006.html#MPT-LSI-Logic-Host-Adapters:-mpt and am wondering why you guys don't just port the mpi driver from OpenBSD. There is nothing in the mpt driver that doesn't work in mpi. We have mpi working on all platforms that have PCI slots and it is quite a bit faster than the ported mpt ever was. All items listed work perfectly in OpenBSD. Before you go off on a target mode tangent... The hardware does not support it; the only thing it does is async mode which is only used for MS cluster support. There is no point in having that in the driver so that should not be a reason to no support it. /marco