From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Oct 30 02:36:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA15974 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 02:36:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ninbox.ml.org (hsv1-150.airnet.net [207.242.81.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA15968 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 02:36:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@airnet.net) Received: from airnet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ninbox.ml.org (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA03116; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 04:34:10 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <36399620.3E8680D0@airnet.net> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 04:34:08 -0600 From: Kris Kirby Organization: Absolutely None! X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.0-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timothy J Luoma CC: sales@wcscnet.com, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, abuse@ALTER.NET Subject: Re: Windows NT Serial Communication Driver References: <199810292028.PAA12818@ocalhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Timothy J Luoma wrote: > Spamming should be punishable with jailtime and loss of Internet access for > at least 1 year after the spammer is released It suddenly occurs to me that if the courts and police attacked spammers with the zeal and lack of regard they give "hackers" the spammers would probably be without internet access for 10-20 years, in addition to jail time. But I guess only the Secret Service have that influence. -- Kris Kirby UAH Mail UAH CS Home WWW ------------------------------------------- TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message