From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Dec 9 15:59:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324C4E8F907 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Received: from hraggstad.unrelenting.technology (hraggstad.unrelenting.technology [IPv6:2605:2700:0:3:a800:ff:fee9:2feb]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hraggstad.unrelenting.technology", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DAA46A755 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:59:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@unrelenting.technology) Received: by hraggstad.unrelenting.technology (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6d9cfa61 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Some updates to Wayland stuff To: Johannes Lundberg Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: From: Greg V Message-ID: <3719ff97-052e-b7b0-3585-acb21a6bb794@unrelenting.technology> Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 18:59:24 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 15:59:34 -0000 On 12/09/2017 18:50, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > We should have a common repository for all Wayland stuff. I suggest yours :) Yeah, I'm always open to pull requests. > Maybe now with flavors we can get wayland enabled gtk30 in ports as well? It's enabled in the Gnome team's repo, which I have merged into mine. https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports-gnome/tree/gnome-3.26 I don't think flavors are necessary here, Wayland is already getting enabled by default in many ports. Honestly it should be straight up made non-optional, always build Wayland support everywhere by default. > Or maybe we should just switch to ravenports if that's easier to work with? What's ravenports?