Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:52:16 +0100 From: marius@alchemy.franken.de To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Maho Nakata <maho@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/ifc Makefile Message-ID: <20021121145216.GU89667@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <3DDCE8CF.4020801@Leidinger.net> References: <200211192257.gAJMvpUe017556@repoman.freebsd.org> <3DDCE8CF.4020801@Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:08:15PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Maho Nakata wrote: > > > Modified files: > > lang/ifc Makefile > > Log: > > Marked as broken if icc or linux_devtools are > > installed. > > > > Suggested: Marius <marius@alchemy.franken.de> > > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> > > I haven't suggested to mark it broken when linux_devtools is installed. > The reason why icc is BROKEN then is because icc picks up linux headers > instead of FreeBSDs headers. This results in broken binaries. > err, right, me neither. > I assume that fortran programs don't use C headers, so there should be > no need to mark ifc BROKEN when linux_devtools is installed, except ifc > picks up the linux linker instead of FreeBSDs linker (this may matter, I > can't remember if it matters in the icc case, as I hadn't linux_devtools > installed). > ifc calls the ld-wrapper which in turn is a fbsd binary and therefore calls the fbsd linker. that's the reason why the real-ld-symlink for icc could be killed. in case fortran doesn't use c-headers (i don't talk fortran...) i'm also of the opinion that the check for linux_devtools can be removed from the ifc-port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021121145216.GU89667>