Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 May 2006 15:03:12 +0300
From:      Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Number of maintainers vs. number of ports
Message-ID:  <20060522120312.GB97197@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
In-Reply-To: <20060522113032.GA50521@pentarou.parodius.com>
References:  <cb5206420605220417o5a5d8667l648f42644f39d4e4@mail.gmail.com> <20060522113032.GA50521@pentarou.parodius.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:30:32AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
>=20
> It would be interesting to see these statistics generated for ports
> that *are not* maintained by ports@freebsd.org.
>=20
It's not that hard to do it yourself:

$ cut -f 6 -d '|' /usr/ports/INDEX-6 |grep -v ports@FreeBSD.org |wc -l
   10411

$ cut -f 6 -d '|' /usr/ports/INDEX-6 |grep -v ports@FreeBSD.org |sort -u |w=
c -l
    1512

10411/1512 =3D 6.89

--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv

Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
                -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

--PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFEcaiAFw6SP/bBpCARAsoPAKCapg65ljfeeKYJkhBmSmEEXpSa1gCg4N3D
JP3HpsTPuuvBC7Wldc+yly4=
=Yd3x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060522120312.GB97197>