From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 19 18:03:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DE216A4CE; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:03:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B500343D49; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:03:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3JI5IjW082910; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:05:18 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42654719.7030607@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:59:53 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <20050413210855.GA15088@bitsurf.net> <200504131714.20356.jkim@niksun.com> <86fyxt1ovu.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050415005850.GB80903@dragon.NUXI.org> <2fd864e050414180911e4e5be@mail.gmail.com> <20050415211600.GA1473@dragon.NUXI.org> <1113603823.91832.7.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <86ekdbdnqh.fsf@xps.des.no> <4260F103.5050309@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20050419173247.GB26152@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050419173247.GB26152@dragon.NUXI.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: "O. Hartmann" cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:03:15 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:03:31PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>I have ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe mobo. BIOS revision is 1006. I have no >>problems with >>ACPI. APIC works with NO_MIXED_MODE commented out in kernel. > > > Disable the NO_MIXED_MODE option is a performance degradation. > Bending over and taking it up the a** across all motherboards (which DES > has forced on 5.4-RELEASE); makes the ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe not "perfectly > working". > According to the APIC maintainer, and according to some quick benchmarks myself, mixed mode has almost no performance impact. Scott