From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 7 02:56:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A8816A400 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tls@panix.com) Received: from l2mail1.panix.com (l2mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F4713C44B for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tls@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by l2mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDCC5CFE6 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:37:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C9C3480A for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:37:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tls@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id l672b1m06514 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:37:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:37:01 -0400 From: Thor Lancelot Simon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070707023700.GA11829@panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Subject: Safely mount OS X UFS filesystem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tls@panix.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:56:55 -0000 Can I, on a system running FreeBSD 6.2 or -current, safely mount a UFS filesystem created (and used) on Mac OS 10.4.10? These filesystems are UFS1 (at fslevel 3) with big-endian datastructures in the metadata, 4k blocks and 1k fragments, and a few minor oddities in their layout; they are pretty much exactly the UFS NeXT used on their workstations. If so, Will such a filesystem be safe to mount under OS X after I use it on FreeBSD? I seem to be able to mount these under NetBSD though the snapshot code complains that inodes 64 and 16384 are not dedicated to snapshots. -- Thor Lancelot Simon tls@panix.com "The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam Chomsky