From owner-freebsd-bluetooth@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 14 23:29:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9C81065674 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9397C8FC15 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 16476 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2009 23:29:41 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (mi@[216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 14 Apr 2009 23:29:41 -0000 Message-ID: <49E51C60.5020302@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:29:36 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090407) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Meyer References: <49E3DB35.4030601@aldan.algebra.com> <49E41DBB.5090805@aldan.algebra.com> <20090414184507.5afc4a88@bhuda.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20090414184507.5afc4a88@bhuda.mired.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org" Subject: group-related limits (Re: RFC: obexapp - virtual root folder for each device) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Using Bluetooth in FreeBSD environments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:29:43 -0000 Mike Meyer написав(ла): > On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:34:43 -0700 > Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > > >>> Maksim Yevmenkin написав(ла): >>> because all of the bluetooth users would have to be listed in obex' >>> group and so there can be no more than 20 of them (I think, that's the >>> limit on a group size). >>> > > Just so this doesn't wind up being quoted as accurate: > > There are no limits on how many people can be in a group. There is a > limit on how many groups a person can be in (or was; I haven't > verified that this hasn't been changed recently). Thanks for the correction, Mike. I had only a vague memory of there being some limits related to groups -- from years ago :-) But still, if a person can only participate in so many groups, forcing participation in yet another one for common, non-administrative functionality should be avoided... Fortunately, we seem to have just agreed on a more straightforward way anyway. Yours, -mi