From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 27 20:10:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA13349 for current-outgoing; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail12.digital.com (mail12.digital.com [192.208.46.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA13344 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from muggsy.lkg.dec.com by mail12.digital.com (8.7.5/UNX 1.5/1.0/WV) id XAA06178; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:05:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from tunsrv2-tunnel.imc.das.dec.com by muggsy.lkg.dec.com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) with SMTP id AA18546; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:04:53 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19691231160000.006a2650@netrix.lkg.dec.com> X-Sender: popmatt@netrix.lkg.dec.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 Demo (32) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 20:04:35 -0800 To: Jeremy Chatfield , "Daniel M. Eischen" From: Matt Thomas Subject: Re: de0 timeout Cc: current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 06:08 PM 2/27/97 -0700, Jeremy Chatfield wrote: >FWIW, we've tried both the SMC and Linksys boards with this DEC chip. >The SMC boards worked, the Linksys failed. We exchanged the Linksys >EtherFast 100/10 for SMC EtherPower 100/10 (+$50) and things were just >fine. We used two Linksys EtherFast boards, different batches from the >same store and they consistently failed in the same way. The Linksys 10 >Mbit/s with RJ-45 and 10Base2 was just fine though. The symptoms of our >failure were complete. No traffic in or out at 10Mb/s, tested with link >flags in all combinations, complete with power-down reboots between >tests, showed no change in behavior. This was, BTW, true for Linux >2.0.27 kernels, too. Curiously the DEC interrupt test that shipped with >the DOS based diagnostics, claimed to be unable to find the DEC chip on >our (multiple) test systems. We *really* tried to make this work ;-) > >I was under the impression that a Tulip by any other name, worked just >fine. In practical experience, there seems something different about >some boards. The SMC boards consistently work for us. The Linksys >10Mb/s only (RJ45, 10Base2 or AUI) boards consistently work for us. Unfortunately, that isn't true for the 21140 (or later) chips. Which is why I'm rewriting the de driver. The information to run the cards is in a serial EEPROM and my rewrite involves decoding that ROM and using the information to configure the card. However, it doesn't quite work right yet. Right now I only have limited number of cards that the support the SROM information and that makes testing problematical. (hint hint). -- Matt Thomas Internet: matt@3am-software.com 3am Software Foundry WWW URL: http://www.3am-software.com/bio/matt.html Westford, MA Disclaimer: I disavow all knowledge of this message