From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 29 21:56:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632AF1065672 for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292248FC1C for ; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DCC17104; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2TLuDKZ008264; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:56:14 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Bakul Shah From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:33:20 MST." <20080329213320.387805B42@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:56:13 +0000 Message-ID: <8263.1206827773@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash disks and FFS layout heuristics X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:56:17 -0000 In message <20080329213320.387805B42@mail.bitblocks.com>, Bakul Shah writes: >Given this, does it even makes sense to use the FFS layout? Certainly not, but until somebody writes us a filesystem that is optimized for SSD access times, that's what people will be using. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.