From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 07:15:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF5D106566C for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFE18FC0C for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (smtp11.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.67]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id EFA9AC224DF; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:15:35 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1327043736; bh=jQDq9BnkwJPcb4GSn6Zmp/DbS3PbrMjo2aQvQMKanRw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=thwfBYNLbWq2SH0JiiwsUFAgD7EyfUvIv5YHZr3jNstwAj97ZEJ9xKsNKgtb14Dbi JN0aR8nAHtr55TQIp58kMXkDR0TjTBC7hr4Fu0wH15O/PsNGVUH3Gd8QvRPSh9JE1h SujczugW7Viy2aHNvxyVQquZ35L5OvfA+vq58JNw= Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BFAC57E0510; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:15:35 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1327043735; bh=jQDq9BnkwJPcb4GSn6Zmp/DbS3PbrMjo2aQvQMKanRw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vk6uhNSg5dh2nccYjyxmrlbGaFDeWv1xr4NMY0o+gq0EWg/YIktx3OdxobuOcLQ7y rk+0VpB11Zvj+a6Xb1rB36tbJVJEWBXPg5qpuAkQ+iN2FcDIigfdYP/4gNpQPCjcIj 82MO0TvofEBqA3iqT25W37js3o29BCFi4l+PZLmU= Received: from unknown (unknown [176.8.25.138]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id FZP88Sax-FZPiEoi4; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:15:35 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:15:33 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KfQnyDQmtC+0L3RjNC60L7QsiwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1667449136.20120120091533@yandex.ru> To: Attila Nagy In-Reply-To: <4F190F3F.7050302@fsn.hu> References: <4F190F3F.7050302@fsn.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-rc@frebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding setfib support to rc.d/routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:15:38 -0000 Здравствуйте, Attila. Вы писали 20 января 2012 г., 8:52:47: AN> Hi, AN> Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited AN> capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because AN> we can assume it's stable now. AN> But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people AN> hacking with rc.local or various scripts in various places. AN> There is a(t least one) PR about it: conf/145440, which proposes a AN> standard method for setting up different FIBs in a seems to be logical AN> way, which is compatible with the current single routing table method of AN> static_routes. AN> Are there any objections about this PR? Is there something we can do to AN> get it committed? I have a patch http://kes.net.ua/softdev/fib_patch.html AN> Thanks, AN> _______________________________________________ AN> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list AN> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net AN> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru