From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 15:25:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DDE16A41F for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:25:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F21F43D6A for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hornetmadness@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so26890rns for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:25:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U2fqsaj9JcJbuKQw1is7VSqWI3ZlXWnFRkOLTeVnRe9e/UuLQnJYTn5jr2ZCA8TbfMBD1x5vxoGGSsejPvvfuUNkqVRLfJOANUWlaBc+d5IFLdXgJlsgSFmGOHim4GHnZkeVGlg9hCU/6nc7kVtrKPgXQy0eqKb1UbjEF0J/63U= Received: by 10.38.6.14 with SMTP id 14mr29884rnf; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.44 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:25:02 -0400 From: Hornet To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44oe8wi66m.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050718163250.D28772@maren.thelosingend.net> <44d5peixay.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720004530.B48721@maren.thelosingend.net> <44ackhk43d.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050721001829.D61532@maren.thelosingend.net> <44oe8wi66m.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some sort of filter based filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hornet List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:25:19 -0000 On 21 Jul 2005 10:29:05 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Svein Halvor Halvorsen writes= : >=20 > > * Lowell Gilbert [2005-07-20 09:19 -0400] > > > You're right that the outputs wouldn't *have* to be pre-generated, b= ut > > > doing it on the fly would make the project both more difficult to > > > implement and (I think) less convenient to use. > > > > This, I do not get. Why is it, that this would be less convenient? In > > fact, I see no other use for this than to save disk space when you want > > data available in several (information perserved) formats? >=20 > I see it as being something you will usually want when you're copying > the music off somewhere else. In that case, the speed hit would be > annoying. I don't expect people to play the same songs in different > formats on the same machine... It seems that if you were to do such a thing, that's all that box would be able to do is the conversion until you are done. Also if you are reading faster then you are writing and don't have lots-o-ram, its all going to go to swap. Then you are writing the file essentially twice, and boging down the drive even futher.