From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 3 13:33:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6742106566B for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:33:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=04409cda91=ob@gruft.de) Received: from main.mx.e-gitt.net (service.rules.org [IPv6:2001:1560:2342::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606298FC19 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ob by main.mx.e-gitt.net with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SF3rr-000Kaz-Jz for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:33:51 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:33:51 +0200 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120403133351.GY65313@e-Gitt.NET> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20120330083830.GB65313@e-Gitt.NET> <4F761F4B.90409@p6m7g8.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F761F4B.90409@p6m7g8.com> X-Face: "TT~P'b_)-jKU_0^a=usXryz`YTz)z.[FZrI,A~PREI2U}frrZ`>_J&; ^t|^.dR/mqtC,Vb.Y>~u8(|aL)vAv(k">zY"]*m*y|b8S7:WK[/qP5i>HO#Ek; C[X:b|FP0*Ly_4Ni User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Subject: Re: 9-STABLE, ZFS, NFS, ggatec - suspected memory leak X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:33:52 -0000 --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:02:03PM +0000, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-March/239643.ht= ml >=20 > Same issue different thread. Different software. >=20 > Its not NFS, its ZFS. >=20 > I don't really have a place to try it on 8.2, but my hunch from things > I've done rather similarly which don't cause tell me its a new issue in > 9.0, though I won't swear by that. So we're having different issues. I could boil it down to NFS=20 definitely: If I change back to the old NFS server the problem=20 immediately stops. I'm currently checking, where in the new NFS server might be the problem=20 (together with people who have a deeper understanding of what's=20 happening). - Oliver --=20 | Oliver Brandmueller http://sysadm.in/ ob@sysadm.in | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk96/D8ACgkQiqtMdzjafymtrgCguwhXnBFt6s4v/VOGgvZvLloN W4QAn2XzFu9fPokotbdKlWWTl+XNgDBc =h03x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt--