From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jun 19 7:33:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cisco.com (sword.cisco.com [161.44.208.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E597437B403 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sjt-u10.cisco.com (sjt-u10.cisco.com [10.85.30.63]) by cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA05920; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: (sjt@localhost) by sjt-u10.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/CISCO.WS.1.2) id KAA07798; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:32:52 -0400 From: Steve Tremblett To: David Syphers Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: upgrading to 4.6 and upgrading XFree Message-ID: <20020619103252.F7674@sjt-u10.cisco.com> References: <20020618111700.D20627@sjt-u10.cisco.com> <200206181923.11337.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200206181923.11337.dsyphers@uchicago.edu>; from dsyphers@uchicago.edu on Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 07:23:11PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG +---- David Syphers wrote: | On Tuesday 18 June 2002 10:17 am, Steve Tremblett wrote: | > When making the world, there's an option for NO_X11 (or something like | > that), so I'm just curious as to what actually depends on that and if | > the version matters? | | Where is there a NO_X11 option? Making world does not depend on X. In | general it's a good idea to set the version of X in make.conf, however. The | default has changed from 3 to 4 (in FreeBSD 4.6). I remembered seeing this option before but I'll be damned if I can locate a document that mentions it now. Maybe I'm completely wrong. Oh well | > I'm a little spooked about using portupgrade for XF86 - I can't figure | > out why it doesn't understand the versioning on my system - when I run | > portversion it shows MANY of my packages have a version GREATER than | > /usr/ports, even after cvsupping /usr/ports and rebuilding the index. | > I tried portupgrade for a few things and it started "upgrading" | > dependencies but it actually tried to install lesser versions before I | > stopped it. | | Portupgrade should work fine for X. The version problem is a little puzzling. | I assume that /usr/ports isn't actually being updated. Are you sure you have | a server specified in your supfile, and that you've uncommented all the port | directories you want updated? cvsup is definitely updating my ports. I've played around a lot with this and I just can't figure it out. I will cvsup my ports tree, remake the INDEX and run pkgdb -u or pkgdb -F, but I still get this output: maelstrom > malsync > mkisofs > mozilla > mp-letter = mpeg_lib = mpeg_play = mtools > mutt > nasm > ncftp3 > More than half will show ">" | > Can anyone suggest the best old-style route to upgrading X? I'm | > guessing I should rebuild all my X-dependent ports as well? | | The old style route is to pkg_delete the program, and then install the new | version. However, this is what portupgrade does, but with automatic | dependency handling. The X-dependent ports should be rebuilt, I'd guess. Thanks. I'm going to give more attention to this annoying portupgrade problem and maybe I can get that going. I'm certainly not going to use it until it stops being confused about my versions! :) -- Steve Tremblett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message