From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Sep 5 12:18:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD206E5D27 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46PKTn4WDQz4fnR for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9AB08E5D26; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A74BE5D23 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46PKTn3Wgdz4fnL for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DC640A5 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x85CILQL078300 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:18:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x85CIL7v078299 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:18:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214767] Add make (ports) targets that alias pkg lock/unlock commands to be consistent with other available commands/expectations Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 12:18:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, feature, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: bapt@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not Accepted X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 12:18:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214767 Baptiste Daroussin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |Not Accepted --- Comment #4 from Baptiste Daroussin --- I strongly think this is a bad idea. lock and unlock are imho feature that should not be promoted too much has it has a lot of drawbacks and can lead = to many problems. Adding new targets in the ports tree will just promote it ev= en more. Beside that. The ports tree is not a place to do package management. it can install because it is mandatory to be able to build packages. so it does not have to present all commands pkg have via targets. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=