From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 04:56:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139D816A418 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za) Received: from munchkin.clue.co.za (munchkin.clue.co.za [66.219.59.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D275613C455 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=20070313; d=clue.co.za; h=Received:Received:Received:To:cc:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:X-Attribution:Date:Message-Id; b=SMJN0z6D3COO7HEapT76acuVRQ9bvKYTpaHQv08zlMBUPjqUzQYV0B4pz0zvBHtlnSML2W+mhpOIceLUGdSo5Fn6y8/HnxiIMf1wQdKxbb7pZezHb/xs3n8XHoGWdD6GsOrphRRPp9A2rOwNmRBAle5M1iQg9N8dIfKRtUn692jOiHexme2cbBYE5hx8IjrBF8xCYbUg0MflgswWry/m/t9Bmdu5+9lWjWJCj3J1AQ4ibScXSpbqEQ3PCBoowZCA; Received: from uucp by munchkin.clue.co.za with local-rmail (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IwW11-0004in-DK; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:56:15 +0000 Received: from ianf.clue.co.za ([10.0.0.6] helo=clue.co.za) by urchin.clue.co.za with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IwW0m-0008Qy-6r; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:56:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=clue.co.za) by clue.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IwW0k-0006bo-7L; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:55:58 +0200 To: Mike Silbersack From: Ian FREISLICH In-Reply-To: Message from Mike Silbersack of "Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:21:51 CST." <20071125142118.G6541@odysseus.silby.com> X-Attribution: BOFH Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:55:58 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: Kip Macy , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP RST+data! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:56:19 -0000 Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > > I see. Playing around with net.inet.tcp sysctls, disabling delayed_ack > > fixes the problem with this phone. Do you think that this is a bug > > in the phone's TCP stack? > > > > Ian > > One more question I forgot to ask - does net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=0 help the > situation at all? Even if not, please send me a tcpdump of that as well. No, none of the RFC options makes a difference in this case. Ian -- Ian Freislich