From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 02:34:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30FD106566B for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp03.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3158FC18 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2011 22:34:27 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.2.3-GA) with ESMTP id AZM36572; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:34:26 -0400 Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2011 22:34:26 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20008.57778.393668.758638@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 22:34:26 -0400 To: ssgriffonuser In-Reply-To: <4E2878EB.7060502@gmail.com> References: <201107191631.p6JGVu6V034273@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4E26589B.9070406@gmail.com> <4E27E3CA.4080803@bananmonarki.se> <4E2878EB.7060502@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:34:28 -0000 ssgriffonuser writes: > > My isp is blocking outgoing traffic on port 25. > > Yeah, it looks like your right. I never would've considered my ISP > blocking outbound traffic from my home, but I suppose it makes > sense. It is my understanding many I.S.P.s in the U,S, do, as part of spam control procedures. I am obliged to relay through my I.S.P.; after some initial set-up issues, this works flawlessly as long as at least one relay machine is up. Robert Huff