From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 22 16:46:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA70616A419 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from minimarmot@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EBC13C4A5 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from minimarmot@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so940878rvb for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:46:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=fET1pwXxa3ay3azxJC53atlYBzlcK9NOoQNuV8lTJOs=; b=mITlpWMfZLm4alBjE6uNEbria4fmeJPLlOv4LS5L9hlXhG+W/GPbO7rDxMdm8AUXx/gu+trTlM1lzCGjDV4Dn3cN3vdyXkeEA+BxCeOAsBiPLDShAx7g6oYR0dlqH854tkzMzLR+/lwyzw1XGSFsTbVg3n8WosCqY4dXy2T9KXU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jysOEuL+0h3HYAx1C9CfpIQyKhz17rbOxGC+upPUhOszYLPFdBVhwsMxOHy/18A3Jt/OSXtdLicSsi3VdXqWHx7YSbkFpc6rbN9MVuPrSsVdUr36zP2S4T2m1Jlt1wVhSCaw7fFO4UX4WHPq0XhDzxwgw+sJHXqgyex1DbT1i8g= Received: by 10.142.113.17 with SMTP id l17mr332403wfc.1190479599224; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.14.9 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:46:39 +0000 From: "Ben Kaduk" To: "Bruce A. Mah" In-Reply-To: <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47d0403c0709211213n50988b33u2b9bdd15475bfcdd@mail.gmail.com> <1217454532.20070922005116@rulez.sk> <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sgml entities for CPU architectures? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:46:39 -0000 On 9/22/07, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > > >> I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s > >> (somewhat) new daily snapshot > >> builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64. Should I just use literals for > >> these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven't found yet? > > > > As far as I know, we do not have entities for architectures. > > The release documents grew these entities fairly recently...see > src/release/doc/share/sgml/release.ent (on HEAD only at the moment). But is release.ent pulled into the build of books/faq/book.sgml ? -Ben Kaduk > > Bruce. > > > >