Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Nov 1997 22:42:32 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
To:        Eric Anderson <keric@websidestory.com>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 2.2.2 -> 2.2.5 upgrade
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971116224045.9641B-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.96.971114184249.18807J-100000@mail.websidestory.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Eric Anderson wrote:

> > UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES UPGRADE ANY MACHINE ON ANY 3.0-SNAPS.  YOU WILL
> > BREAK THEM IF YOU DO.  The mount() system call semantics were changed and
> > if you downgrade them to 2.2.x you won't be able to mount your disks
> > except from the appropriate fixit floppy.  
> 
> So are we screwed with the SNAP versions as far as upgrades go?

I reread that and I should have qualified ``upgrade'' to mean
``upgrading'' to 2.2.x-branch RELEASEs.  You can safely upgrade any 3.0
SNAP to any future 3.0 SNAP or -CURRENT.  

> And how does the upgrade from the boot disk affect any configuration
> files (such as in /etc)?

It does as it does now, it puts files to be updated in /etc/upgrade and
lets you merge them in as you desire.

I think :-)

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971116224045.9641B-100000>