From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 9 1:55:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from brea.mc.mpls.visi.com (brea.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6907937B400 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 01:55:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from aradia.mc.blaine.cybernetik.net (unknown [208.42.12.140]) by brea.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F312DDD82 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 03:55:19 -0600 (CST) Received: by aradia.mc.blaine.cybernetik.net (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 889BD14FED; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:39:00 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:39:00 -0600 From: Kristofer Pettijohn To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamming FreeBSD lists. Message-ID: <20020107183900.GA60707@cybernetik.net> References: <87ofk6dnjh.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ofk6dnjh.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > It seems to me that this might be one extra hoop for nonsubscribers, but > nothing too incomprehensible or onerous, and it would profoundly reduce the > amount of spam. > Good idea? Bad idea? Or even disallow non-subscribers from posting at all? If they want to post bad enough, they should be part of the list :) -K. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message