Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:50:17 -0800 From: Richard Schilling <rschi@rsmba.biz> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linksys PCM200 Message-ID: <419BC799.2090803@rsmba.biz> In-Reply-To: <419BC434.30805@cognitiongroup.biz> References: <419B2AEB.30007@cognitiongroup.biz> <20041117131502.K9997@bahre.achedra.org> <419BC434.30805@cognitiongroup.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Looks like there's a couple of versions of the card. I have the PCM200 Version 2, whatever that means for the chipset. Linksys tech support thought it was the ADMtek chipset, but I suppose there could be a couple different ADMtek chipsets available ... I'm waiting to hear back from technical support. I've also sent in an e-mail to the people who wrote the Linux driver. It would be really nice to see, for each version of the card, what the chipset is... Richard Schilling > > > Ketrien I. Saihr-Kenchedra wrote: > >> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Richard Schilling wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> I still get watchdog timeouts, and eventually a kernel panic which seems >>> to be related. Is there an additional patch to the 5.2 code that I can >>> apply to take care of the watchdog timeout? >> >> >> >> That's odd, to say the least. I looked at the patch, and really all it >> does is get dc(4) to pick up the PCM200. Can you possibly check and make >> absolutely sure it's an ADMtek AL985 on the card? Also, what PHY is on >> the >> card? Maybe Linksys -did- use two different chips with the same PCIIDs. >> (That'd be -real- fun...) >> >> -Ketrien I. Saihr-Kenchedra >> > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?419BC799.2090803>