From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 15 13:59:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F033A16A41F for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FAD13C471 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1FDwxVa057954; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:58:59 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070215075147.027f1450@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:58:49 -0600 To: "Dak Ghatikachalam" From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.2.20070214161344.0278ad60@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: RAID 10-LUN Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:59:41 -0000 To determine the optimal stripe size you need to analyze whether you will read and write large data chunks or smaller data chunks. Then opt for either a larger or smaller stripe size. Remember though that the larger a stripe the more potential for wasted disk space. In general you can either manage RAID in the hardware, or in the hardware along with some OS compatible software. Running RAID 10 with hot spares makes the OS management piece not terribly necessary except to see the array status and any RAID failures. These will also show up on the console when the system is booted. If this server will be remotely managed you will want to use software from within the OS to manage the RAID. -Derek At 10:29 PM 2/14/2007, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: >At 02:54 PM 2/14/2007, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: >>Hi Freebsd >> >> >>We have DELL/EMC CX-300 storage array hardware , Navisphere. , which consist >>of 15 Disks 320GB, I am planning to use this for Oracle( Linux) + SQL >>server(M$) purpose. >> >>We need to get that redundancy using RAID 10 and striple for the best >>performance. >> >>My thoughts are take most even number of possible disks( leaving private >>system partition area) and create the raid groups and kick a separate LUNS >>for MSSQL purpose. >> >>With this hardware config, Do you have any suggestion on getting the best >>performance and redundancy in place >> >>Thanks >>Dak > > >On 2/14/07, Derek Ragona ><derek@computinginnovations.com > wrote: >>RAID 10 uses even numbered drive sets, usually in 4's, so 4 drives, 8 >>drives, 12 drives, etc. Depending on how 24/7 self-managed you want the >>array, you should plan for at least 2 hot spare drives for fail over. >> >>So in your setup you could have one logical array made up of 12 drives, >>with 2 spares, and one left for the OS. One consideration in striping is >>the stripe size. Stripe size effects performance but also storage >>efficiency. So you want to balance those factors in choosing a stripe size. > >How to determine the stripe size Dell recommends the OS striped across 5 >disks and calls itself system private paritition >How to determine the optimal stripe size, will I be able to ditch the >current navisphere the Storage Array OS( which is now windows based I >t and stick Freebsd in its place. We have got nice GEOM ability now. > >Thanks >Dak > > > >>One last issue, is make sure you have enough cache on the RAID controller. >> >> -Derek > > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for >their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.