From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 28 16:01:50 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576A7106568E
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [220.233.188.227])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46A68FC1C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n0SG1ksQ088378;
	Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:01:46 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:01:45 +1100 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <5510133465.20090128101516@yandex.ru>
Message-ID: <20090129014910.V86094@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References: <58305.62.206.221.107.1233071856.squirrel@anubis.getmyip.com>
	<20090128183250.O86094@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
	<5510133465.20090128101516@yandex.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Sebastian Mellmann <sebastian.mellmann@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de>,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re[2]: IPFW DUMMYNET: Several pipes after each other
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:01:50 -0000

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, KES wrote:

 > ????????????, Ian.
 > 
 > May be this will be usefull for you

Yes, but I need to read it more times :)  Nicely answers the question 
about stats per flow/queue anyway, not too hard to parse for logging.

 > #1. ping -D -S 10.10.16.16 -s 1472 -i 0.01 10.0.16.1
 > #2. ping -S 10.10.16.17 10.0.16.1

Results suggest that #1 was -S 10.10.16.19 ?  A script running the same 
number of #2 before killing #1 (or such) would make comparisons between 
different runs easier to follow maybe?

Thanks, lots of useful info; hoping to try some weighted queueing soon.

cheers, Ian