Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 19:40:15 +0200 From: dick hoogendijk <dick@nagual.st> To: Daniel Bye <dan@slightlystrange.org> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gcc-3.2.2 Message-ID: <20030423174015.GA5731@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20030423153641.GA49328@catflap.home.slightlystrange.org> References: <20030423153124.GA10768@pooh.nagual.st> <20030423153641.GA49328@catflap.home.slightlystrange.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Apr Daniel Bye wrote: > I don't think there's anything to worry about - on my system, > /usr/bin/gcc is version 2.95.4, and GCC 3.2 is installed as gcc32, in > /usr/local/bin. Buildworld will use the one in /usr/bin (i.e., the > right one). OK, thanks for the relief ;-)) Does this mean that portupgrade now automagically chooses which gcc version to use (depending on the programs?) And in which cases can I better choose gcc32 (manually)? What are the benefits of both gcc versions? Is it better to stay w/ 2.95.4 for most programs? -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.8 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030423174015.GA5731>