From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 13:17:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D579F16A4CE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:17:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007EF43D68 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:17:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) Received: from [192.168.2.49] (66.227.161.255.kzo.mi.chartermi.net [66.227.161.255]) (authenticated bits=0)ESMTP id i82DL9el082309 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:21:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) X-Authentication-Warning: adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net: Host 66.227.161.255.kzo.mi.chartermi.net [66.227.161.255] claimed to be [192.168.2.49] X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <7A727F81-FCE2-11D8-8BE7-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com> X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to . X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lucas Holt X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:17:45 -0400 To: FreeBSD-Questions Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.amerclamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on (³‰©¿M X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: portindex/portindexdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:17:50 -0000 After seeing several posts recently on portindex, I decided to try it out. Most of the posts claimed you had to run portsdb -u after portindex. Is it safe to use portindexdb instead of portsdb -u? Another words I want to do this: cvsup ... portindex portindexdb portversion -v | grep "<" Lucas Holt Luke@FoolishGames.com ________________________________________________________ FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging)