Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 11:53:47 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Gerald Abshez <gerald@manhattanprojects.com> Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Auditing ports Message-ID: <19991205115347.A69102@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <384691C6.347BE836@manhattanprojects.com>; from gerald@manhattanprojects.com on Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 10:35:34AM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912011631060.10470-100000@hub.freebsd.org> <384691C6.347BE836@manhattanprojects.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 10:35:34AM -0500, Gerald Abshez wrote: > While I'm all in favour of making _everything_ secure, I feel we > have to concentrate on the core functionality. Let's not put the > cart before the horse - The base system should be fully eyeballed > before we get all of the ports done. Not necessarily. The *ONLY* time any of my FreeBSD boxes have been broken into was thru the Qpopper buffer overflow. There are key ports that are network listening daemons that should take as high a priority as any of the base network listening daemons. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991205115347.A69102>