From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 30 01:04:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E5516A4DD; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=julian=390fd56d3@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD1F43D4C; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=julian=390fd56d3@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.18.229]) ([10.251.18.229]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2006 18:04:12 -0700 Message-ID: <44F4E40C.7000101@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:04:12 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <20060825220033.GC16768@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060826055402.W43127@fledge.watson.org> <200608291627.32524.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200608291627.32524.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Jeremy , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , Michael Bushkov Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:04:13 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: >On Saturday 26 August 2006 01:00, Robert Watson wrote: > > >> > >Agreed. I also think LDAP would be a very useful thing to add. I know that >I currently use NIS/yp because it just works and is integrated into the base, >etc. I think adding LDAP as the logical successor to NIS/yp would be a good >thing. > > > I agree with John. Historically things have moved to the base system when they have reached some amount of public use, and they have been needed for a large number of othre parts.. e.g. SSL. I think that LDAP has reached this point (in fact did so many several years ago) and having a standard ldap implementation in the base system allows us to make FreeBSD machien splay better in many environments. It can always be removed for 'small' systems but I think that having the ability to exist in ldap envrinments by default is getting more and more important.