From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 16:40:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE6D1065672 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mwi1.coffeenet.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC168FC12 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:40:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=CZBmd4mvENV0qFSpBVSiA1DuamJrTBmTOVM4Rndj4k4=; b=OJct1YqUtuD2IwEsfz/Y94hhNUfLtmb4X/j/SeMCTJlY9dnhrvAEh/9NvmbN40muLuLYSCN9KHy9zJIDg87pWEjfg/1d/gh3gjXOyC/oZUp4EBOWI5Kzh+zapTBqsN91; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mwi1.coffeenet.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QzAN8-000OhL-Ep for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:44:11 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.3) with esmtpsa id 1314895444-1948-1947/4/12; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:44:04 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:40:22 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.0 Subject: Re: ZFS V28 on 8.2-RELEASE write behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:40:30 -0000 On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:50:26 -0500, Dave Cundiff wrote: > Any help tracking this down would be greatly appreciated. > There have been numerous changes to v28 in -STABLE since June. Can you reproduce the behavior with a recent build of -STABLE instead of -RELEASE? Perhaps even on -CURRENT? Regards, Mark