Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:46:16 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: FreeBSD Arch <arch@freebsd.org>, Gordon Tetlow <gordon@tetlows.org> Subject: Re: On errno Message-ID: <20090402084616.19846py8s75ogp44@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <A72F9BE4-2D74-436B-9FB3-19CF93AD6F78@mac.com> References: <8321954E-5CFF-45F9-9F87-BE83659E4C8D@mac.com> <FE53FDC4-6416-458C-A10C-C2C70A085C83@mac.com> <4e571dd70904010928w1900ca9ey740f256c344cdd57@mail.gmail.com> <A72F9BE4-2D74-436B-9FB3-19CF93AD6F78@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> (from Wed, 01 Apr 2009 =20 10:23:58 -0700): > If we were to write a compiler, the "Ugly American Programmer." > article would apply. Writing an OS, I would say that it applies > partially at best (one can make a distinction between operators > and users, and operators tend to prefer english AFAICT). In my experience operators prefer a language they understand well, but =20 this may be biased by the kind of operators I know (I work in a =20 multi-lingual environment, but we do not use FreeBSD at work). So =20 personally I would not distinguish between operators and users. I agree with your general opinion about i18n and think that it is not =20 a matter of workforce, it's a matter of feasability. As soon as we =20 have the infrastructure, translations will show up "soonish". It's not =20 "if", it's "when". Bye, Alexander. --=20 Real programmers don't write in BASIC. Actually, no programmers write in BASIC after reaching puberty. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090402084616.19846py8s75ogp44>