Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Apr 1998 16:20:22 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
To:        Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why is xtend in the base system?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980420161931.523T-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
In-Reply-To: <19980420155034.A4214@rtfm.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> Why is xtend in the base system, anyway? It's definitely not
> essential, AFAICS. Maybe it should be moved into ports?

Because it uses kernel drivers and would be prone to getting crufty if it
wasn't in the base.

Leave it be, I actually want to play with X10 at some point.

/* 
   Matthew N. Dodd		| A memory retaining a love you had for life	
   winter@jurai.net		| As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to
   http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53	
*/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980420161931.523T-100000>