Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:53:32 -0400 From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Message-ID: <20001023175332.B29365@electricjellyfish.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010240445540.23970-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>; from Alexey Dokuchaev on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:49:40AM %2B0700 References: <20001022153957.A4742@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010240445540.23970-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:49:40AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Well, would not be this stepping aside from BSD startup sequence, which we > all know and love? Having dozens of small files instead of pair of > big ones always frustrates me when I have to work with linux. well, it's a single directory full of small files, as opposed to a bunch of directories, each with its own collection of files, with ugly numbers at the beginning of each one. that's better in my book. and at the very least, with a number of smaller files, assuming they're named well, you can find what you're looking for faster, and not have to dig though the one monolithic script to find out how sometihng is working. -- garrett rooney my pid is inigo montoya. rooneg@electricjellyfish.net you kill -9 my parent process. http://electricjellyfish.net/ prepare to vi. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001023175332.B29365>