From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 14:42:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28E2FBF; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFFE8FC08; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:42:12 -0800 Message-ID: <50E44742.2060009@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:42:10 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release References: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> <50E3E926.9010507@aboutsupport.com> <50E3EEA2.1090906@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <50E3EEA2.1090906@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 14:42:12.0898 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A0D0020:01CDE8F7] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: "Zyumbilev, Peter" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:42:12 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 02/01/2013 08:00, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote: >> In this case for a new Nas4free machine, will you recommend to base it >> on 9.0 or 9.1 ? > > Either. Whichever one works best for you, and if you can't distinguish > them on performance or bug-fixes, choose 9.1. > > However, don't fall into the trap of thinking 'because I'm running OS > version 9.0 I have to use the binary packages for 9.0.' You don't. And > in fact, if it's more than a month or so since the OS was released, you > should be checking for updates. > > Unfortunately, since the security problem, there haven't been updates to > package sets for *any* OS versions available. So your best recourse is > to pull down a copy of the ports tree and build what packages you need > for yourself. This is time consuming, but not particularly difficult. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > what is the status of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-current/Latest/ which is on the ftp servers?